Archive for the ‘MiserWare’ Category

MiserWare Becomes a New AASHE Business Member

Friday, April 26th, 2013

MiserWare, Inc. Deepens Commitment to Sustainability

MiserWare, Inc. has recently become a member of the Association for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education, an association of colleges and universities working to create a sustainable world. Through its membership in AASHE, MiserWare will be able to better understand and assist higher education institutions in advancing their sustainability initiatives.

“Our green IT software, Granola Enterprise decreases computer energy use by up to 35%, with no impact on performance,” said Erica Putman, head of MiserWare outreach. “If it ran on every computer used in universities nationwide, Granola could cut power bills by millions of dollars, helping higher education communities meet their energy-related sustainability goals. We’re excited to start our membership with AASHE!”

(more…)

Announcing FatBatt Fifty: Helping Laptop Customers Shop For Battery Life

Friday, April 12th, 2013

Which laptop will top the list?

(more…)

Announcing FatBatt: Get the Most Out of Your Laptop Battery

Wednesday, February 20th, 2013

MiserWare, Inc. is pleased to announce the launch of FatBatt power management software for Windows laptops. FatBatt allows you to optimize and maximize your laptop’s battery, finally solving the problem of painfully low battery life.

(more…)

Improve the reliability of your PC

Tuesday, June 26th, 2012

TLDR – scale your CPU speed to match demand and your PC will be more reliable.

Microsoft Research has published a very interesting peer reviewed paper where they look at the causes of crashes in over a million consumer PCs. This is the most comprehensive investigation into crashes on home PCs that anyone has ever undertaken. The paper has a bunch of cool findings including what you can do to reduce the chances your PC will crash or die completely.

Apart from hardware completely killing itself, we have all been victims of software crashes. It is easy to blame these on the programmer but sometimes the hardware itself has done something to pull the rug out from under your program. Sometimes it is just an essay you have been working on, but every now and then it is right before your game gets saved.

Microsoft found, after studying the crash reports from more than a million PCs that there are a few things we can do to make our machines live longer. Some people will intuitively have guessed some of these conclusions but this is the first time we have had some facts to back them up.

Overclocking

When Intel or AMD make a CPU they perform a bunch of tests at the factory to choose which clock speed the CPU can reliably run at. You do not have to run your CPU at this manufacturer specced speed though. For years people have been overclocking their CPUs to run faster. When overclocking a CPU you ramp up the speed iteratively until you find a speed which seems to give you system stability. Often you will upgrade cooling or buy a bigger power supply to keep the CPU running at the higher speed. Microsoft found that over an 8 month period a CPU that is overclocked is up to 20 times more likely to have a failure than at a vendor rated speed. Microsoft don’t names names, but one CPU vendor does better when overclocked (figure it out).

Underclocking

People have been wondering if reducing the clock speed of a CPU will make it more reliable. The idea is that reducing the speed means CPUs do not get as hot and require less electricity, the reverse of overclocking. Microsoft found that running your CPU at a lower speed meant machines were up to 80% less likely to crash in the 8 month period.

The paper shows that reducing the CPU speed reduces the failure rate and suggests that you can minimize the likelihood of a CPU crash by operating at the slowest CPU speed to achieve the desired performance.

Matching CPU Speed to System Demand

As Microsoft points out, we PC folks already have a technology in our computers that can control the CPU speed called DVFS. The difficult thing is matching the speed of the CPU to the demand. If you set the speed too low you will be slowing the machine down, if you set it too high then you are needlessly taxing the CPU as well as wasting energy.

MiserWare has a consumer version of its power management software called Granola Personal which was designed to match CPU speed to system demand. We made it primarily to reduce your energy footprint but it will do exactly what Microsoft suggests, set your CPU to the lowest speed it needs to run at.

Download Granola Personal

Granola settings window

Granola is available for PCs running Windows XP-7 and Linux Ubuntu, Fedora, Debian and RHEL. By default after it is installed it will manage your CPU in “MiserWare mode” which will change the CPU speed to match demand. You can also force your CPU to its lowest speed if you wish, using the settings window which looks like the screenshot. Matching your CPU speed to demand has the bonus of saving you some money on your power bill.

If you have a large number of PCs like a university lab and do not want to have to install Granola Personal on every machine there is a simpler to version for you to use. Granola Enterprise (free to try) is designed to be rolled out on large numbers of machines and be centrally managed. You can find out more about it here.

Too Short – Want To Read More

If you find this interesting I highly recommend reading the paper. It has a wealth of cool stuff and technical details.


Mat

Compiling the mistakes of a professor and entrepreneur

Tuesday, June 19th, 2012

Thinking about your mistakes can be a disheartening exercise, an experience in self-denial, or an event from which you grow. Here’s hoping this next series of blog posts is the latter.

But let me preface this with some working assumptions. There are good mistakes and bad mistakes. And there are little mistakes and big mistakes. For example, sometimes you make a mistake in the short term that ends up working in your favor. That’s a good mistake. A bad mistake might be repeating the same mistake twice or not heeding someone’s sage advice. A little mistake might be choosing the wrong logo or mantra or something. But, honestly, none of these types of mistakes really matter.

The ones that matter are the BIG mistakes. I know, no surprise there, right? But you’re going to make every type of mistake along the way, so hopefully the big ones will be few and far between. Why? Because BIG mistakes can kill small companies. In this post, I’m going to focus on the BIG mistakes I’ve made along the way. Hopefully, you can avoid them and if not, at least you’ll know you’re not alone when making them.

When do the big mistakes matter? They matter when you don’t recover from them. The beautiful thing is I’m living proof you can recover. How do I know? Well, because I’m still here, that’s why. So, let’s see what happened and whether these things can be avoided; and perhaps most important how we managed to survive.

Mistake #1: Losing your biggest and only customer

After we were funded at Virginia Tech by Merrill Lynch to build power management software with performance guarantees for critical servers, we started a pilot with ML and our newly incorporated company. Though it was slow going, it went great. We hit all our numbers: 15% energy savings with virtually no loss in performance for tough simulation workloads running on ML servers. They ran the software on analyst machines and no one complained. Everyone was happy, what I refer to as a regular “love fest”.

Enter global economic disaster. ML basically went bankrupt by the end of 2007 and ultimately got bought by Bank of America, but before that, like animals running from a fire or rats leaving a burning ship, everyone on our project at ML got new jobs elsewhere. The project was first put on hold and then canceled entirely. We never got a cent. We were left with great results we couldn’t talk about to anyone (under NDA) and no more champions. We actually eked forward on the project for about 6 months just because the results were so compelling, but then it just fizzled.

One customer is not enough

The BIG mistake was that we put too much stake in one customer. One customer is not enough. No matter how big they are or how deep their pockets, you must branch beyond them. You must create something that lots of people will buy. I would shoot for 3-4 people that want to buy what you will make. Two is too few. But more than that and you just might be on to something that you can sell to masses of clients for hundreds of millions per year.

We designed what ML asked for (a Linux-based solution) which it turned out few really wanted. We were early as a company. We didn’t have the chutzpah to tie cost discounts to timely completion of the pilot and so (not surprisingly in hindsight) without a forcing function on ML, the pilot went on forever (mostly in delays from their side).

It’s not that they didn’t love us, we were great together. But, we started out with the leader of their R&D acquisition team (our champion) and when we got to the pilot we were assigned an intern. Yeah, that’s right, an intern from some name brand school that they hired for a semester. And guess what (another big surprise), he knew next to nothing about system administration. It wasn’t his fault, he was only in his second year undergrad or something – he may not have even been a CS major for all we knew. Also, we designed software we could install; not software to be installed by a second year undergrad with little experience. We went to great lengths to get the pilot done quickly including sending one of our technical folks to London (yeah, the one in England) just to help them through. Epic failure.

So, you must tie your pilots to milestones or create a pilot workflow that is not on your critical path. For example, our latest software is designed for anyone to do their own pilot on their own time. They get value from obtaining their free energy footprint (i.e. incentive) and we get the benefit of more people using our software and more chances at upsell opportunities to the pay-for version. A pilot now costs my company next to nothing aside from the random telcon or support email for bigger potential clients. We made the software incredibly easy to install, by anyone, even our 2nd year undergrad friend (BTW, he was a really nice guy and learned fast — the real issue was ML gave him 10 projects like ours to do in just 3 months).

Time Kills All Deals

Another mantra you should commit to memory: Time Kills All Deals. That’s always been true – especially when dealing with big businesses. Champions move around and you will lose them over and over again if your pilots take too long to convert. Keep that in mind when you start out.

So, how did we recover from the loss of our biggest and only client? The results had come back promising. So, we used them as evidence of the viability of creating intelligent power management software and we closed a small funding round with a venture firm, some angels and a state-sponsored VC. Luckily we closed that quickly and just before the big economic bust. So, we had capital to keep us afloat while we figured out what to do next.

… Windows programming … “steaming pile of crap”

It was initially a tough time for the team since we felt like we weren’t creating software people wanted. So, partially with some thought and foresight mixed in with a little bit of desperation, we decided to (gulp) create a Windows product for consumers. Now, this is a team that lived and breathed Linux. No one knew how to write Windows code and everyone dreaded it. People have referred to Windows programming as a “steaming pile of crap” and we held that opinion at the time. Frankly, it was a scary proposition.

But, as Alexander the Great said “Fortune Favors the Bold” and my co-founder and I knew we needed to get people to use our awesome software. The results were too compelling to be ignored — energy savings with no noticeable performance loss. And people were 1) screaming for more battery life from their laptops, 2) looking for ways to be green, and 3) looking for ways to cut costs in their IT infrastructure and data centers. So, we went for it. It took us 6 months to write and release the first version of Granola… but, we got 100,000 downloads in the first 100 days. Wow. We could breathe again. And that took us from castaways from the worldwide economic depression to the makers of the world’s most popular power management software, Granola.

What was Mistake #2? Failing to raise the capital. More on that in the next blog post.

Why isn’t every professor an entrepreneur?

Wednesday, June 13th, 2012

Professors and researchers are idea machines. We regularly attack problems so hard we refer to them as “Grand Challenges”. I’m surprised we don’t have more monuments erected to celebrate our glorious profession.

If ideas were enough, all of the following people I see regularly would have thriving companies we’ve all heard of: my brother, my dad, my in-laws, my colleagues at VT, my colleagues abroad, my barber, students that take my classes, students from various business schools, parents of my kids’ friends, random people that approach me after I give a talk, and many more.

… having a good idea is the easy part.

So, why don’t they? Because having a good idea is (frankly) the easy part. Average professors lack the skills to build a company. But I’m living proof that some professors can learn to build companies. The problem is that learning on the job is far from optimal.

Before I created my company when I first started talking to VC’s, the prevailing wisdom was that I was a typical (absent minded) professor and just about anyone would be better to run a business than me.

In fact, I had already built a business once — I had grown my research group from zero to ten people and raised enough research capital to sustain a $1.5M/year operating budget for about 7 years. I managed all types of personalities, built software, partnered with other groups and labs, wrote proposals, produced high quality papers, and my work changed the way people use computers today. I was the CEO of a small business that had international influence and was part of a multinational, billion-dollar company (my university). So, to trivialize my experiences as not even remotely similar to building a company was a bit insulting.

Early on when dealing with potential investors, my professor title was the elephant in the room.

Luckily, being a professor means having thick skin. Early on when dealing with potential investors, my professor title was the elephant in the room. Like people trying to tell you you’re crazy without saying the word “crazy”. “This is a great idea, Kirk. But, are you really sure you’re the right person to make this into a company?” Some, under the auspices of tough love, were more direct: “you should stick to your day job.”

Luckily, my experiences and my ego were enough for me to discount most of these folks. Now, to be honest they were partially right. What they should have been saying was that there are people out there who would be better at building a business from a good idea. That’s absolutely true. Having built a startup, I now admire business brilliance now as much as I admire scientific brilliance. But, don’t let anyone substitute an MBA as equivalent to business brilliance. Find people who have built businesses from nothing into something worth tens of millions of dollars at least.

… I now admire business brilliance now as much as I admire scientific brilliance.

Over the years I’ve found both those talented enough to run my business and those willing, but I’ve not found those criteria combined in one person. That means I had to convince others (my investors, my cofounder, my developers, my mentors) to take this journey with me based on a good idea and somewhat irrational optimism. I’ve made plenty of mistakes, but luckily the mistakes I’ve made we’ve been able to recover from (so far).

So, when should you go for it? Some say that when you can convince at least one other intelligent person to join you, that’s the time to start. Others say you carefully analyze 1) the market potential, 2) the people involved, and 3) the technology, in that order. My advice would be to find someone willing to buy a product that captures your technology if you build it. Try to estimate how many more people would buy what you build. If there are enough people willing to buy, then start building your products. Find someone to take this journey with you since it is long and arduous.

What did I do? Well, I’m not sure if my story is something that will convince you to go for it, or dissuade you from it. While the stories you read about information technology companies still prevail in the press, most of these “overnight successes” are about a decade in the making. So, the get-rich-quick-fantasy ends shortly after you start your company. Successful entrepreneurs are not driven by money, but by passion for seeing their ideas propagate in the marketplace. As Guy Kawasaki would say, “make meaning.”

… our first customer evaporated …

For us, under my leadership, we initially built the wrong product. We built client-server software for Linux and our first customer (Merrill Lynch) evaporated in the Wall Street economic disaster. Luckily, we recovered and quickly built a Windows freeware version (Granola) that was wildly popular. Requests for Granola Enterprise versions started generating some revenue. We then realized we could not build client-server software for the Enterprise in an emerging Cloud-based world. So, we moved to a cloud-based infrastructure and adoption is picking up rapidly with our recent free software that measures your IT energy footprint. These were not technical decisions. We were responding to the market to build products for purchase so we could grow as a company. These key changes have enabled us to sustain ourselves long enough to attract several big government contracts and a growing user base of universities and corporations.

In summary, an idea is not enough – especially for a professor. Execution is everything. When you figure out how to productize your idea for the first time, be ready to adapt. If you can bring in a business builder who believes in your idea as much as you do, you are starting from stronger footing. If you can, find customers that will buy what you are selling as soon as you make it. But, if you lack all of these and can’t see yourself pursuing this idea for 5-7 years or more, you should probably just stick to your day job.

Most of our trials and tribulations so far have been business related. Our small size and technical capability have allowed us to adapt more quickly than others in the space. But, the CEO (me) was learning on the job. This means we possibly could have avoided some of these mistakes. What’s the biggest mistake I’ve made so far? Running out of money. But that’s the topic of another blog post altogether.
_____
Kirk

The Entreprofessor

Friday, June 8th, 2012

pro·fes·sor
A teacher of the highest rank in a college or university.

en·tre·pre·neur
A person who organizes and operates a business, taking on financial risk to do so.

entre·professor
In Portuguese, this means “between teacher”. In English, this is a portmanteau combining the sound and meaning of the words entrepreneur and professor.

The Entreprofessor: Yet Another Blog? Well, yes and no.

Those that know me know that while I am a technophile in many aspects, I’ve been reticent about the world of social media. I’m not sure why I’ve avoided writing personal anecdotes more publicly other than to provide the standard “who cares what I have to say” argument I’ve used (at least to myself) for years. Optimistically, I could argue that generally I was waiting until I had something worth saying.

I am a firm believer that advice is worth exactly what you pay for it (and I’ve never been paid for advice to my best recollection). Nonetheless, I do have a unique set of experiences that may help someone somewhere. And to this end I, begrudgingly to some extent, submit to you the reader that I am often asked to recall certain experiences over the usual set of libations at workshops, conferences and the like. Admittedly, I find these discussions many times invigorating as they bring to the surface the raw excitement I encountered when first asking these questions myself.

So, in some ways, yes, this is the beginning of yet another blog. But, in other ways it is not since the topic is generally my experience at the intersection of academia and industry. You see, I have been a professor now for over a decade and an entrepreneur for almost half that time. I’m by no means done with either career; in fact you could say I’ve really just gotten rolling. Nor may I be the best person to seek advice from — while I’ve had my share of success, others have certainly surpassed my accomplishments on both sides of the fence. Still, perhaps the most interesting aspect is that my story is not finished and without taking the time to put some of it in print, I am likely to forget many of the details.

They say smart people learn from their mistakes and smarter people learn from the mistakes of others. I’ve tried to do both. And in this way I am indebted to many that have helped me along the way. Consider this blog part therapy and recollection, and part paying forward for the advice selflessly imparted to me throughout the years.

So, what do I plan to cover? Well, I thought I would begin with answers to questions I am asked frequently and go from there. For instance, after a wave of publicity surrounding my company and our initial products, colleagues began approaching me at conferences to hear my story and to understand the basics of spinning out companies from universities. Perhaps it is just red car syndrome on my part, or perhaps there is pent up demand for a roadmap on how to take an idea from the university laboratory and create a business.

But alas, a word of caution. The opinions in my blog are mine and mine alone. They are strictly based upon my experiences and in no way should be considered as representing the official opinions of my company (MiserWare) or my university (Virginia Tech). That means others may not agree with my conclusions or advice and you would be best served to read everything out there and draw your own conclusions. This also means I’m not planning on holding anything back — which means you’ll hear the good the bad and the ugly of starting companies from universities.

Now, let’s stop talking about what this blog is and get to writing actual useful content, shall we?
_____
Kirk

Name that bear

Thursday, May 17th, 2012
What should we name the bear?
 
 
Edit 12/June
The poll is over, Norbert won.
Max on the bear

_____
Mat

MiserWare offers free organization-wide IT energy footprint with new Granola Enterprise

Monday, April 23rd, 2012

MiserWare offers free organization-wide IT energy footprint with new Granola Enterprise

Blacksburg, VA – April 23, 2012 – Organizations can now quickly and accurately measure their total IT power use at no cost with the official release of Granola Enterprise 5.0. MiserWare developed Granola Enterprise to empower organizations to immediately establish the baseline power consumption for their entire IT infrastructure. From laptops to PCs to the datacenter, organizations can quickly and easily evaluate their energy footprint without the need for expensive hardware.

According to CEO Kirk W. Cameron, a professor at Virginia Tech and pioneer of power measurement and management software, Granola Enterprise was redesigned in response to enterprise and datacenter clients. “Our clients are often mandated to report IT power use,” Cameron elaborated, “A free account now gives organizations access to their IT energy footprint, making it easy to identify energy waste and evaluate power management options.”

In addition to the expanded measurement capabilities, Granola Enterprise offers industry-leading options for energy savings. Joseph Turner, co-founder and VP of Engineering, says that while other products save energy by simply turning systems off when not in use, Granola Enterprise saves up to 35% more by also reducing energy waste while systems are in use. “Our patent-pending performance guarantee technology ensures energy savings with no loss of availability or performance,” said Turner. “That’s why our software is used by clients in all situations from critical datacenter environments to office PCs to battery-powered mobile workforces.”

MiserWare’s Granola Enterprise helps organizations identify and eliminate energy waste in their computers. MiserWare also built the world’s most popular free power management software: Granola Personal. MiserWare’s Granola products have been listed on TIME Magazine’s Top 20 Ways to Go Green and PC Magazines Best Free Software and received a CNET Editor’s Rating of 4.5 stars (out of 5).

Contact:
Kirk W. Cameron
press@miserware.com
http://grano.la
http://www.miserware.com
(540) 552-2914

MiserWare Signs Deal with IQT to Provide Software Power Management to NGA

Tuesday, July 19th, 2011

MiserWare Signs Deal with IQT to Provide Software Power Management to NGA

Blacksburg, VA – July 19, 2011 – MiserWare, a leading developer in software power management, today announced a strategic partnership agreement with In-Q-Tel (IQT), the independent strategic investment firm that identifies and delivers innovative technology solutions to support the missions of the U.S. Intelligence Community, to introduce MiserWare’s Granola Enterprise and Datacenter software to the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA).

“NGA is excited to be the first intelligence agency to use MiserWare’s revolutionary technology to reduce power costs and its carbon footprint,” said David. K. White, National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency liaison with In-Q-Tel. “We look forward to deploying this capability at our new headquarters in Springfield, Va., and across our two major facilities in the St. Louis, Mo., area as well as our support teams worldwide, in the near future.”

MiserWare’s Granola Enterprise software enables users to reduce their environmental footprint and track energy savings over thousands of computer systems. The smart software automatically slows down the processor when the workload is low and brings it back up to maximum speed when needed. Granola can save as much as 35 percent of total system energy without ever impacting the computers’ working performance. As part of this strategic partnership, MiserWare will work closely with IQT and its customers to expand the features of the Granola Datacenter software.

“The U.S. Intelligence Community is more focused than ever before on reducing energy waste,” said William Strecker, Executive Vice President of Architecture & Engineering and CTO at IQT. “MiserWare’s Granola Datacenter software is designed to save energy without loss of availability in mission critical government systems.”

“Our partnership with IQT will provide access to government customers focused on energy management in the data center,” said MiserWare CEO Kirk W. Cameron. “The potential energy waste reductions resulting from this partnership will support the dynamic computing needs of the U.S. Intelligence Community.”

About MiserWare

MiserWare makes software that reduces energy waste in computers. Their patent-pending technologies ensure energy reductions without loss of performance or availability. Granola software power management is MiserWare’s flagship product and is available for free for personal use. Granola has been listed on TIME Magazine’s Top 20 Green Tech Ideas and PC Magazines Best Free Utility Software. Granola is also available for business use in versions for the enterprise and data centers. Follow MiserWare on Twitter and Facebook.

About IQT

In-Q-Tel is the not-for-profit, strategic investment firm that works to identify, adapt, and deliver innovative technology solutions to support the missions of the U.S. Intelligence Community. Launched in 1999 as a private, independent organization, IQT’s mission is to identify and partner with companies developing cutting-edge technologies that serve the national security interests of the United States. For more information, visit www.iqt.org.

About the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency

The National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency is the nation’s premier source of geospatial intelligence. As a Department of Defense combat support agency and a member of the U.S. Intelligence Community, NGA provides imagery, geospatial and targeting analysis, along with image sciences and modeling for U.S. national defense, disaster relief and safety of navigation. NGA seeks to know the Earth, show the way, and understand the world. For more information, visit www.nga.mil.

Contact:
Kirk W. Cameron
press@miserware.com
http://grano.la
http://www.miserware.com
(540) 552-2914